In some cases, tripartite agreements may cover the owner of the land, the architect or architect and the contractor. These agreements are in essence “not a fault” of agreements in which all parties agree to correct their errors or negligences and not to make other parties liable for unfaithful omissions or errors. To avoid errors and delays, they often contain a detailed quality plan and determine when and where regular meetings will take place between the parties. Guarantees of guarantees are agreements linked to another “primary” contract. They provide for the extension of a duty of care from one of the contracting parties to a third party that is not a party to the original contract. A typical example would be that an architect of a new office development owes a duty of care to a building occupant, to the extent that subsequent defects may arise. Responsibility between the architect and the occupant would prevent liability without a guarantee of guarantee. (Although most of the architects of the IP insurer do not allow a Collateral Warrante agreement to be accepted and would not guarantee the architect in this case). In particular, tripartite mortgage contracts become necessary when money is lent for a property that has not yet been built or improved.
Agreements resolve potentially conflicting claims about the property if the borrower – usually the future owner – breaks down, or may even die during construction work. Third-party guarantee agreements help reduce or offset the risk to the lender. The lender benefits by obtaining a return on a guaranteed product. The borrower has more flexibility in granting guarantees, as well as increased cash available for short-term financing strategies. One theory confirms that it is possible to characterize creditworthy letters as an auxiliary contract for a third-party recipient, since letters of credit are driven by the need of the buyer and, in accordation of Jean Domat`s theory, to the cause of a letter of credit, a bank issues a credit in favour of a seller in order to exempt the buyer from his obligation to pay directly to the seller with a legal offer. There are three different companies involved in the letter of credit transaction: the seller, the buyer and the banker. Therefore, an accreditation contract is theoretically understood as a guarantee contract, which is accepted by a behaviour or, in other words, as a tacit contract.  It will soon be called LOC For example, in order to ensure timely work planning and quality treatment, the borrower would not want to pay the contractor until the work has been completed. But the owner may not be paid once the work is completed, when he himself owes money to suppliers such as plumbers and electricians. In this case, a contractor may claim a “pledge” in the field; That is, the right to deontisation if they are not paid. In the meantime, the bank is also entitled to the property if the borrower is late in the loan.
Guarantees of guarantees are agreements linked to another “primary” contract. They provide for the extension of a duty of care from one of the contracting parties to a third party that is not a party to the original treaty. A typical example would be that an architect of a new office development owes a duty of care to an occupant of a building, to the extent that it may result in consecutive defects. Responsibility between the architect and the occupant would prevent unsecured liability. (Although most ip insurer architects do not allow the acceptance of a collateral Warrante agreement and would not guarantee architects in this case). In the English case Barry v Davies, it was found that an auctioneer and a buyer had entered into a secondary contract.  It was found that, although the main contract does not concern incense, the benefits granted to the offer are a good consideration for the increase in the price of the offer.